FREE DELIVERY HEALTH CHECK

How reliable is your
event delivery?

Your code already contains the answer.
Let your coding agent find it.

Find hidden failure points in your integrations, webhooks and event pipelines. Run a free assessment directly in your repository using the coding agent you already use.

Your coding agent READ ONLY

Run a read-only Delivery Health Check on this repository.

Follow the instructions at:
https://queuey.ai/healthcheck/agent.md

Identify event delivery risks, provide file and line references, and prioritize findings. Do not modify application code or configuration. Do not transmit repository content or assessment results to Queuey without my explicit approval.

No source code uploaded to QueueyRead-only analysisWorks with your coding agent

See what gets checked

One prompt. Your repository.
A Delivery Health Check.

Claude Code · Cursor · Codex · Your agent

Open your repository

Use the coding agent you already work with.

Run the prompt

Your agent retrieves the latest Health Check instructions from Queuey.

Inspect delivery reliability

The agent examines actual event flows, error handling and recovery logic.

Get your findings

Review prioritized risks, code references and recommended next steps.

In your development environment — not a browser scanner

Repository

Coding Agent

Delivery Analysis

Health Report

WHAT GETS CHECKED

The failures you don't see are often the ones that matter.

Successful API calls don't tell you what happens when networks fail, receivers restart or acknowledgements disappear.

Event loss & durability

Can events disappear between being created, acknowledged, stored and delivered?

Retries & backoff

Are failures classified correctly? Are retries bounded, delayed and handled safely?

Duplicates & idempotency

Can retries, lost acknowledgements or repeated requests create duplicate side effects?

Dead-letter handling & replay

What happens when delivery permanently fails? Can events be inspected, recovered and replayed?

Outages & recovery

What happens when a receiver is unavailable, a service restarts or connectivity disappears?

Operational visibility

Can developers identify failed deliveries, understand why they failed and take corrective action?

Also assessed where relevant: ordering, destination protection, authentication, signing and edge-to-cloud delivery.

Every finding is linked to code evidence or explicitly marked as a hypothesis requiring validation.

FROM CODE TO CLARITY

Know where delivery can break.
Before it does.

Prioritized findings, source references and practical next steps. Evidence and confidence are explicit — not hidden behind a score.

DELIVERY HEALTH / EXAMPLEExample report — illustrative only

HIGHDurabilityHigh · code observation

Retry without durable storage

Events may be lost if the process terminates before the retry completes.

src/integrations/deliver.ts:42–58 (example)

Retry state lives in process memory; no persistent handoff is visible in this path.

P1Persist the event before acknowledging it. Validate recovery after a worker restart.

HIGHIdempotencyMedium · hypothesis

Duplicate processing risk

Retries may trigger repeated side effects without an idempotency safeguard.

src/webhooks/orders.ts:31–47 (example)

The handler applies the side effect before replying; no deduplication guard is visible in this path.

P2Confirm whether a downstream guard exists. Test a lost acknowledgement and repeated event ID.

MEDIUMRecoveryMedium · scoped observation

Limited recovery visibility

Failed deliveries are logged, but no replay mechanism was identified.

src/jobs/send-event.ts:76–84 (example)

Exhausted attempts are logged. Recovery tooling was not found in the inspected scope.

P3Check for recovery tools outside this repository; otherwise add inspectable failure records and controlled replay.

Potential Queuey fit: durable handoff and controlled replay could replace custom delivery workers here. Receiver-side idempotency still needs validation. Existing infrastructure may already be sufficient.

YOUR RESULTS

Real findings. Straight from your code.

Your coding agent produces a structured assessment with identified risks, code references, severity and recommended next steps. You can review the findings directly in your development environment.

Evidence-based findings
Prioritized recommendations
Your repository stays under your control

Found something worth fixing?

Identifying delivery risks is useful. Removing the infrastructure behind them is even better.

Queuey handles buffering, retries, destination protection, recovery and replay, so your team doesn't have to maintain that logic across applications.

See how Queuey works Discuss your findings

Without Queuey

ApplicationCustom delivery logicRetries / failures / recoveryDestination

With Queuey

ApplicationQueueyDestination

A few practical questions.

Do I need a Queuey account?

No. You can start the assessment with your own coding agent without creating an account.

Do I need to upload my code?

No source code is uploaded to Queuey. The assessment runs through your own coding agent, which may process repository contents according to its provider's terms and your configuration. Queuey does not receive your code because you run the check, and results are only sent to Queuey with your explicit approval.

Will the Health Check change my code?

No. The default assessment is read-only.

Does it only work with Queuey integrations?

No. It is designed to examine existing event delivery implementations, including custom-built solutions and other infrastructure.

Can I use Claude Code, Cursor or Codex?

Yes, provided the agent has appropriate repository access and can retrieve the published instructions.

Is the Health Check free?

Yes. The repository assessment is free.

Your delivery logic deserves
a closer look.

One prompt is all it takes to start finding out where your event delivery could fail.